<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Upper Case - The Anya Legal Journal &#187; claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anyadesigns.co.uk/uppercase/tags/claims/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anyadesigns.co.uk/uppercase</link>
	<description>News, Comment on Opinion on Law, Society &#38; Legal Practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:03:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No Win, No Fee?</title>
		<link>http://www.anyadesigns.co.uk/uppercase/no-win-no-fee</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyadesigns.co.uk/uppercase/no-win-no-fee#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikegribbin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emplyment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard moorhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyadesigns.co.uk/blogs/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conditional Fee Agreements, also known as &#8216;no win, no fee&#8217;, are alternative methods of funding litigation, introduced widely in 2000 when legal aid for personal injury claims was axed. In this type of funding the solicitors share the risk in that if a case is lost the solicitor will not be paid but if the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conditional Fee Agreements, also known as &#8216;no win, no fee&#8217;, are alternative  methods of funding litigation, introduced widely in 2000 when legal aid for  personal injury claims was axed. In this type of funding the solicitors share  the risk in that if a case is lost the solicitor will not be paid but if the  case is won the solicitor will charge a success fee.<br />
CFAs can be used in all  civil litigation except for family cases and provide access to justice for those  who could not afford to pursue litigation and who are not eligible for public  funding. But according to â€˜Press Gazetteâ€™ a number the rich and famous have  taken advantage of the CFA scheme.</p>
<p>As reported in â€˜The Timesâ€™, organisations such as Citizens Advice Bureau have  been urging a review of the scheme, saying that it is not widening access to  justice in the way intended â€“ in fact the actual number of claims has fallen  since â€˜no win, no feeâ€™ schemes were introduced. The complex legal and financial  processes involved are often misunderstood and consumers are misled into  thinking the system will be genuinely â€˜no win, no feeâ€™ but can often find that  costs are hidden and unpredictable. Another criticism is that these deals can  create â€œperverse incentives for the legal professionâ€ and encourage the  cherry-picking of high-value cases with a good chance of success, leaving the  smaller claims.<br />
The Ministry of Justice has commissioned a review of the  arrangements in England and Wales. Justice Minister Bridget Prentice said: â€œNo  win, no fee arrangements are vital in helping to give the public a voice in  courts. However, we are aware of growing concerns that they may not always be  operating in the interests of access to justice. We feel that now is the  appropriate time for a comprehensive, objective and evidence based examination  of the operation of no win, no fee arrangements in relation to personal injury,  employment and defamation cases.â€</p>
<p>Jack Straw has made his views clear. Addressing the Labour Conference in  Manchester last week he said â€œI am concerned about â€¦â€˜no win, no feeâ€™  arrangements. It&#8217;s claimed they have provided greater access to justice, but the  behaviour of some lawyers in ramping up their fees in these cases is nothing  short of scandalous. So I am going to address this and consider whether to cap  more tightly the level of success fees that lawyers can charge.â€</p>
<p>The review is being led by Professor Richard Moorhead, Deputy Head of Cardiff  Law School. He is due to report to ministers in the autumn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyadesigns.co.uk/uppercase/no-win-no-fee/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LSC Misses the Point Again &#8211; Changes to Travel Time Recording</title>
		<link>http://www.anyadesigns.co.uk/uppercase/lsc-misses-the-point-again-changes-to-travel-time-recording</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyadesigns.co.uk/uppercase/lsc-misses-the-point-again-changes-to-travel-time-recording#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikegribbin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exceptional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ilaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lsc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magistrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anyadesigns.co.uk/blogs/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Legal Services Commission has issued a press release to all Crime Contract holders regarding the recording of travel time in Police Station and Magistrates Court cases. From 1st July 2008, providers do not need to record travel time in police station cases unless those cases are classed as exceptional. From 1st July 2008, providers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Legal Services Commission has issued a press release to all Crime  Contract holders regarding the recording of travel time in Police Station and  Magistrates Court cases.</p>
<ul>
<li>From 1st July 2008, providers do not need to record travel time in police  station cases unless those cases are classed as exceptional.</li>
<li>From 1st July 2008, providers do not need to record travel time in  magistrates court cases in the 16 main urban areas as this is already allowed  for in the fee.</li>
</ul>
<p>However&#8230;</p>
<ol>
<li>Given that you donâ€™t always know when a police station case is going  exceptional and</li>
<li>You need to be watching all the costs of providing legal aid work very  closely</li>
</ol>
<p>we would advise iLaw users not to ditch the recording of this time just yet.</p>
<p>One of the most important things that iLaw can give you is a complete  understanding of how much it costs your firm to provide legal aid work under  contract. It helps you now with issues like forecasting cash flow / work in  progress and forward planning and in the future when it comes to competitive  tendering. All of this help needs good data from your team in the form of  accurate time recording so hiding any costs will skew the quality of the  information iLaw can give you. The most successful firms are those who are  recording and monitoring the cost of everything as it enables them to make good  business decisions in time. So use iLaw to its maximum and keep recording your  time well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyadesigns.co.uk/uppercase/lsc-misses-the-point-again-changes-to-travel-time-recording/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

