Posted on 24 May 2010. Tags: anti-social behaviour, Bill of Rights, coalition, crime, extradition act, liberal, tory
Blog “Civil liberties and the coalition governmentâ€, posted last Monday, dealt with the initial Tory and Liberal coalition agreement. It was to be followed in due course by a final and fully comprehensive agreement, and now, surprisingly early, comes that agreement. It is a schedule of over 400 objectives under 31 separate detailed headings (compared with only 11 headings in the original document).
The Civil Liberties section remains unchanged apart from one significant addition. This states: “We will establish a Commission to investigate the creation of a British Bill of Rights that incorporates and builds on all our obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, ensures that these rights continue to be enshrined in British law, and protects and extends British liberties. We will seek to promote a better understanding of the true scope of these obligations and libertiesâ€.
One of the new sections covers Crime and Policing. There is a string of proposals designed to ensure that police forces have greater freedom from Ministerial control, are better able to deal with the crime and anti-social behaviour and are much more accountable to the public they serve. There are also a number of specific alcohol related proposals – a ban on the sale of alcohol below cost price, an overhaul of the Licensing Act to give local authorities and the police much stronger powers to remove licences, a doubling of the maximum fine for under-age alcohol sales to £20,000, etc. There will be better recording of hate crimes against disabled, homosexual and transgender people, which apparently are frequently not centrally recorded. And there will be a review of the operation of the Extradition Act – and the US/UK extradition treaty – to make sure it is even-handed.
Another new section goes under the heading of Justice. There are a number of measures designed to achieve more effective sentencing policies, as well as overhauling the system of rehabilitation to reduce reoffending and provide greater support and protection for the victims of crime. Other specific measures include delivering up to 15 new rape crisis centres, and give existing rape crisis centres stable, long-term funding using proceeds from the Victim Surcharge; and extending anonymity in rape cases to defendants. The introduction of effective measures to tackle anti-social behaviour and low-level crime is promised, including forms of restorative justice such as Neighbourhood Justice Panels. And yet another review, this time of legal aid “to make it work more efficientlyâ€.
The full text of “The Coalition: our programme for government†can be found at:
 http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/documents/digitalasset/dg_187876.pdf
Posted in Civil Liberties, Criminal Justice, Latest, Legislation
Posted on 06 May 2010. Tags: Conservative, crime, justice, Labour, Liberal Democrat, Party Manifesto
Party manifestos are probably the most unread of documents. The major upheaval in political campaigning brought about by the three TV debates between the major party leaders could even render them redundant for future elections. In the meantime, it is not without interest to compare the three main manifestos for what they have to say about crime and justice.
Labour express a determination to continue to bear down on crime, building on the 3,600 Neighbourhood Policing Teams now in every area of England and Wales. They claim 26,000 more prison places since 1997, plan to provide a total of 96,000 places by 2014, while at the same time “taking steps to address unnecessary increases in the prison populationâ€. Tories claim that prisons are chronically overcrowded, reoffending rates remain very high – 100,000 persistent offenders responsible for more than half of all crime – and 80,000 prisoners have been let out early from prison. They pledge that early release will not be reintroduced and they will redevelop the prison estate and increase prison capacity. On policing, their aim is to restore responsibility and discretion to the police, getting them out of police stations and onto the street fighting crime, and giving people the power to elect an individual who will set the policing priorities for their community. Liberal Democrats would pay for 3,000 more police on the beat, reduce time-wasting bureaucracy at police stations with better technology that can be deployed on the streets and give local people a real say over their police force through the direct election of police authorities. They would always base drugs policy on independent scientific advice, including making the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs completely independent of government. For Labour, “on drugs, our message is clear – we will not tolerate illegal drug use.â€
On Human Rights legislation, Labour detail their introduction of the Human Rights Act in 1998, the establishment of the Equality and Human Rights Commission in 2007 and, in 2009, the introduction into Parliament of the new Equality Bill. Lib Dems refer to the importance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which set out the worth of every human being and pledged governments to uphold that worth in future. Hence their support for the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 and support for the passage of the Equality Bill. The Tories take a different line and, to protect and strengthen civil liberties, pledge to replace the Human Rights Act with a UK Bill of Rights and “roll back Labour’s surveillance state, curtail powers of entry for state officials, and introduce new protections over the use of personal data.â€
In the dying days of the last Parliament Jack Straw announced reforms to the libel laws (see blog “Reform of libel lawsâ€, posted on 31 March). The proposals were voted down in the hasty final sessions of that Parliament. Despite that, or perhaps because if it, the party manifesto makes no mention of reform. The Tories promise to conduct reviews of the libel laws as well as family law. Lib Dems are the most specific, pledging definite changes to the libel laws, including Reynolds public interest defences. Legal aid does not get a mention in any of the three manifestos, beyond a promise from the Tories to conduct a review.
 If you want more, try any or all of the following:
http://www.labour.org.uk/policies
http://www.conservatives.com/Policy/Manifesto
http://network.libdems.org.uk/manifesto2010
Posted in Civil Liberties, Criminal Justice, General, Legislation