Posted on 23 November 2012. Tags: house of lords, Justice and Security bill, law society, Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, Lord Pannick, Lucy Scott-Moncrieff, Michael Todd QC, nick clegg, Sadiq Khan, secret courts
Government proposals to expand secret courts suffered a series of hefty defeats in the House of Lords last Wednesday, significantly narrowing the scope of the justice and security bill. This can have come as no surprise to the government. The opposition of human rights groups and many prominent lawyers, and parliament’s joint committee on human rights (JCHR), to secret trials and withholding evidence has been mounting. Read the full story
Posted in Criminal Justice
Posted on 27 April 2012. Tags: house of lords, Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly, Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill, Lord Bach, Lord Chancellor, Lord Pannick
The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill bounced back to the House of Lords on Monday for consideration of Commons’ amendments. Members of the Lords voted eight times during the debate, and in scoreboard terms, the result for the government was played 8, won 4, lost 3, with one sort of score draw. Read the full story
Posted in Civil Law, Criminal Justice, Legal Aid
Posted on 30 March 2012. Tags: Baroness Grey-Thompson, clinical negligence, Conditional Fee Agreements, Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill, Lord Cormack, Lord Pannick, restorative justice, success fees, victims of international corporate human rights abuse
Having already forced nine amendments during the report stage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders bill, peers inflicted further damage on the legislation at the third reading stage of the bill on Tuesday.
Baroness Grey-Thompson (Crossbench), the former paralympian, put down an amendment opposing government plans to save £6m a year by removing as many as 6,000 children from entitlement to legal support. She said: “If the Bill is left as it stands, legal aid for around 35,000 children every year will continue, but legal aid will not be available for around 6,000 children under 18 who would qualify if the current rules remained in place.” Read the full story
Posted in Civil Law, Civil Liberties, Criminal Justice, Law Updates, Legal Aid
Posted on 23 March 2012. Tags: ban on referral fees, Baroness Corston, Clare’s Law, criminal justice, Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill, Lord Beecham, Lord Lloyd of Berwick, Lord McNulty, Lord Pannick, Lord Woolf, not-for-profit organisations, scrap metal theft, squatting in a residential building, The House of Lords, Women's Criminal Justice Policy Unit
The House of Lords concluded report stage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill with three votes on Tuesday. The session on this fifth day went on until past midnight.
Lord Beecham (Labour) moved an amendment on referral fees. He said: “The amendment deals with the position of not-for-profit organisations. We are entirely at one with the Government in seeking to ban referral fees made to commercial organisations simply for the purpose of making profits. However, some organisations – be they charities or membership organisations – receive referral fees from firms of solicitors and perhaps from others…whose contributions help those organisations carry out their main purpose.” Read the full story
Posted in Civil Liberties, Criminal Justice, Law Updates, Legal Aid
Posted on 07 March 2012. Tags: Director of Legal Aid Casework, Legal Aid, Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill, legal services, Lord Pannick
The government suffered three defeats on the first day of Report stage of its legal aid, sentencing and punishment of offenders bill in the Lords on Monday. Despite almost universal hostility during the ten days of Committee stage, ministers had hoped that it would not translate into parliamentary defeats. The bill now seems destined to endure the same difficult passage through the Lords suffered by the proposed changes to health and welfare. Read the full story
Posted in Civil Liberties, Criminal Justice
Posted on 12 January 2012. Tags: civil legal proceedings, Director of Legal Casework, LASPO, Legal Aid, Legal Services Commission, Lord Bach, Lord Beecham, Lord Pannick
Line-by-line scrutiny of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill continued on Tuesday in the House of Lords. Members continued where they left off before the Christmas recess when four amendments to clause 1, which defines the Lord Chancellor’s responsibilities, were debated and then withdrawn without being put to the vote.
Lord Beecham moved another amendment to clause 1 which called upon the Lord Chancellor to Read the full story
Posted in Civil Law, Law Updates, Legal Aid